»  Article Archive  »  Blogs  »  Acoustic Treatment for the Recording Studio
Article Archive

You are currently viewing the old system for RecordingReview.com articles. There are over 200 articles to improve the quality of your recordings in this archive, however, all new articles can be found in the new Recording Blog.

Brandon Drury
Owner of Echo Echo Studios, Brandon Drury, has recorded and mixed over 600 songs in his very busy home recording studio.  

View all blogs by Brandon Drury...
Acoustic Treatment for the Recording Studio
By Brandon Drury | Published  12/18/2006
?

Well after 5 years of recording, I've finally decided to take room acoustics seriously. I've read

several books on the subject, but those don't do a whole lot of good when you don't apply the

results. I've always been so busy recording that I've never been able to stop and say "Wait! I'm

going to work on room acoustics".


Well, I wish I would have done this years ago. Why? Because it turns out that my room has serious

problems!


I tested using Sound Forge's built in "synthesis" feature which allows you to create sweeps and

such. It turns out that 100Hz is almost non-existent on my system. This would explain why my mastering engineer is telling me my bass guitar is too loud even though I intentionally mixed it too low on purpose.


So my brother came over to help and we began doing all sorts of tests to find the ideal place to position my studio monitors. I must say that the frequency response differences are enormous when moving the studio monitor just a couple of feet. Sometimes the difference can be 10 or 15dB at any given frequency. It's easy to see how I wasn't hearing enough bass guitar in my monitors (and therefor leaving them too loud).


It's clear that my room needs some work.


After seeing the frequency response of the room I've been mixing in for years, it's no wonder I've never really been happy with my mixes. Instead of buying $2,000 microphones, I should have been taking a month to make sure my acoustics were right on.


Brandon

 
Comments

  • Comment #1 (Posted by Martin Sharpe)

    I've found that the room is a least as important as the gear when recording sax. If you don't have a fantastic room to begin with (which usually means fairly large) I found it takes a lot of experimenting with absorbers and diffusers to try and get a reasonable acoustic for mixing and recording.
     
  • Comment #2 (Posted by skygod)

    FIRST PRINCIPLES:

    Brandon, quote "After seeing the frequency response of the room I've been mixing in for years, it's no wonder I've never really been happy with my mixes. Instead of buying 2,000 microphones, I should have been taking a month to make sure my acoustics were right on." /end quote

    is the most intelligent and important thing I've heard you say in any of your posts here or at Slutz. I hope everybody can read what you wrote today and sincerely take it to heart, both young and hungry and old jaded engineers set in their stubborn ways ...

    Its almost analogous to: "To get into Heaven, first you have to accept (enter your prophet's name here ____________), but instead everybody goes and buys very expensive clothes and joins a group first thinking that that was most important ..." Ah yes, the parable of the audio engineer:

    "Easier is it for a jackass to record a great radio hit that contains a totally faaked up mix, than a camel record, and mix, and master the record perfectly even though it never passes muster for popular radio jihad appeal ....

    Fix your rooms people, or you are marching in place and will never get anywhere in this business! Do it, then can double-time march into audio combat against the best of them

    But dats what I tink!

    skygod

     
  • Submit Comment