»  Article Archive  »  Blogs  »  How MP3s Effect The Loudness Wars
Article Archive

You are currently viewing the old system for RecordingReview.com articles. There are over 200 articles to improve the quality of your recordings in this archive, however, all new articles can be found in the new Recording Blog.

Brandon Drury
Owner of Echo Echo Studios, Brandon Drury, has recorded and mixed over 600 songs in his very busy home recording studio.  

View all blogs by Brandon Drury...
How MP3s Effect The Loudness Wars
By Brandon Drury | Published  03/23/2007

As anyone who has mixed a record knows, you have to to well out of your way to make a mix that can compete with modern major label recordings in terms of RMS loudness.


Pretty much everyone in the audio recording industry agrees that this loudness war is not helping music one bit. In fact, most people who get their music mastered for maximum volume like the sound better before the music was mastered (at least on the studio monitors they album was mixed on).


When an mixing engineer works long hours to get a mix to sound exactly like he/she envisions, it doesn't make a lot of sense to go in and just smash the hell out of the mix with a limiter. If the mixing engineer wanted to sound that way, it wouldn't be difficult for him/her to do it, in most cases.


Either way... On one hand, we have the loudness wars where labels think they are going to sell less cds if the music has less RMS loudness. On the other had, MP3s are extremely popular. So what?


Well, anyone who has spent a significant amount of time listening to downloaded mp3s knows that the volume level of MP3s jumps all over the place. I'm guessing that it's quite common for a person to tinker with an mp3 before it gets downloaded by millions of people. Of course, the difference in levels could just be normal when switching from a song in one genre and time to a song from a totally different genre and time. Switching from Maroon 5 to Hootie and The Blowfish to The Beach Boys will result in insanely different volume levels, but this level of diversity seems to be very common in mp3 collections.


It seems to me that there is a glaringly obvious contradiction between the labels insisting on louder and louder cds at the expense of the listener (whether they realize it or not) and the fact that so many people who listen to mp3s are bouncing around from mp3 to mp3 without any care at all in terms of the volume level.


So, maybe this is one example that the buying public doesn't give a damn if a song sounds a tad quieter than another song. The Ipod had sold a zillion billion trillion units and everyone of them has the volume control in the user's hand. It seems that this is also the case when listening in the car, on the computer, or with a stereo system that has a remote control. I know of no one who even thinks twice about adjusting the volume control. In fact, ride with a friend in the car and count how many times the driver adjusts the volume. Also, count how many times the listener runs out of volume...(meaning a cd can't be turned up enough to be heard at the desired level).


Brandon

 
Comments

  • Comment #1 (Posted by Bas)

    Well written Brandon.
    However mp3s are free, and i still get pissed when an mp3 i payed to download (Metal genre of course) has lower sound level. I have to set my click wheel to maximum level for such songs and it gives me the feeling that the mp3 has lower bitrate than what i payed for. Maybe wrong, but it surely is not pleasant. As i said, for Metal genre.

    Regards
     
  • Comment #2 (Posted by Brandon)

    You bring up an interesting point. If an mp3 is so low in volume that you can't even hear it, you obviously have problems. I consider this a flaw of the mp3 player manufacturer, but they probably had some liberal organization on their ass who was very afraid that kids may be ruining their hearing with excessively loud mp3 players.

    Either way, some people do get the feeling that they have been ripped off when the volume of a song is down. They think that, as you illustrated, that a low volume recording is some how damaged goods.

    While this is a possibility, most of the time, cds with lower RMS volume are of higher fidelity and offer more dynamics than their overly compressed counterparts.

    I guess this is an issue of subjectivity, though.
     
  • Comment #3 (Posted by Fusion Head)

    My understanding is that the tendency to maximize volume by limiting and compression techniques was originally spurred by the desire of record companies to have their artists/songs sound louder on the radio. This always made me wonder, since radio stations have normally added their own limiting and compression anyway to assure maximum signal level at all times getting over the airwaves to the listener. So, effectively, you may be listening to two stages of limiting when you hear things on radio... or does it simply mean that radio stations no longer have to apply their own limiting because the CDs are so damned squashed already now?

    Anyway, I entirely agree that the quality of released music is suffering drastically these days due to those seeking loudness over clarity and quality. I did a test recently where I went back and grabbed some great old XTC and other stuff and analyzed the waveforms. You can really hear the beauty of well-recorded music that has not been squashed. Big, fat, warm, shimmery .... and dynamic. Then I noticed one song on a new Brand New Heavies CD that sounded bad... so I analyzed it and, yup, limited to death.... square waves.

    Dynamics are at least 50% of the emotion of music. Squash it and what you have is one big trashy line of white noise that makes your head ache after 15 minutes. It expresses only a single emotion: nausea.
     
  • Comment #4 (Posted by .tom)

    you and i dont care about it being THAT LOUD...the corporate squareheds have most people fooled into thinking it is important. they do this to make it hard to for the little guy to compete with the corporate sound of big money cuz they no many of you can mix as well. say it with me... IT'S NOT THAT IMPORTANT... see? wutz important is that it sounds cool...right? right. .5db (RMS) is not that much lower. go ahed, it'll piss them off if we all do it cuz it levels the play field and yer shit is mostly hip'r and their shit is mostly L7;) power to people that rok:)
     
  • Comment #5 (Posted by Brandon Drury)

    The rumor I had was a little different. I heard that a bunch of label guys were sitting around the boardroom thingy listening to a handful of new albums on shuffle. Of course, one song was louder than another. The labels immediately decided that louder was better.

    This would make more sense because I'm not aware of a limiter that doesn't limit when you cross X threshold. Basically, the louder the RMS level of the signal, the more it's going to get smashed by the radio stations.


     
  • Comment #6 (Posted by .tom)

    ...jeez that post got fuk'd. forget about the radio. you and i cant buy that time and if you sellout/sign to disneyland they'll smash it without your consent cuz they're greedy squareheds:) they are controlling your artistic thoughts:)
     
  • Submit Comment