»  Home  »  Blogs  »  Why I Don't Recommend USB Microphones
Article Archive

You are currently viewing the old system for RecordingReview.com articles. There are over 200 articles to improve the quality of your recordings in this archive, however, all new articles can be found in the new Recording Blog.

Brandon Drury
Owner of Echo Echo Studios, Brandon Drury, has recorded and mixed over 600 songs in his very busy home recording studio.  

View all blogs by Brandon Drury...
Why I Don't Recommend USB Microphones
By Brandon Drury | Published  05/9/2007

I hear more and more people talking about (or even buying) USB microphones. To those who don't know what a USB microphone is, let me explain. There are several steps in the recording process. Sound traveling through the air vibrates a mic. The mic converts this vibration into good old analog electricity. The signal is then boosted up to line level with the help of a preamp. From there, the analog signal is converted to digital the computer can manipulate it.

On real deal recording rigs, this takes several dedicated components. On super high end systems, this chain could cost as much as a new car. Then again, you more than likely own records where vocals were recorded with a chain that costs a fraction of that.

Before I start my critique of USB microphones, I do want to point out good uses of USB microphones.

#1 USB microphones are good for documenting sound. In other words, if you simply trying to capture the sound of birds chirping, the sound of cars driving by, taking notes, interviews, podcasting, etc than USB microphones may be okay for this. They may not be the best sounding, but they will be functional and you'd only need a laptop and a mic.

#2 Recording band practices. We've all had the tape recorder laying on the floor in the middle of the jam room. It never really sounds that good, but it's nice to what you really sound like. A USB mic would be great for something like this.

Why I Don't Like The Idea of USB Microphones For Serious Music Recording

#1 Latency – Stock soundcards suck for recording if a person wants to take advantage of monitoring within their recording software. I love running a lead vocal through Cubase before sending the mix back out to the singer's headphones or monitors. A USB microphone does not fix the huge problem of latency and takes away a person's ability to monitor through their software. Not only that, but you will still suffer all the latency issues you do with your stock audio interface (because you are still using the stock soundcard for playback0. In other words, it will probably be nearly impossible to overdub vocals with a USB microphone.

#2 Preamps – I don't think USB microphones even come with an adjustable preamp. This means they are using some sort of auto leveler circuit like you'd find in video cameras. While this is okay for home movies, it's not okay for music recording. While I am a big fan of compressors, I want to control the thing.

#3 Component Quality – With some USB microphones costing less than $100, there is no way there are using high quality components. While I'm a big fan of many inexpensive microphones, paying $100 for the mic, cable, preamp, and analog to digital converter is pushing it a little too far.

Post a comment about this blog
1 2 3 4 5
Poor Excellent
Add comment
Comments

  • Comment #1 (Posted by lumpy)

    Good article Drury. As always.
     
  • Comment #2 (Posted by Bret)

    I have a buddy who's an old hippie and he just got an imac and a usb mic and is recording hours and hours of material. It blows my mind how creative the guy is, he is practically homeless also. Anyway I have several of his cd's and I can tell where the latency issues are in effect! ! ! However, if I were to tell the guy he needs all this extra equipment it would break his heart. Maybe now just isnt the time for siplicity in good sounding recordings, it will probobly take more time for the technollogy to develop.
     
  • Comment #3 (Posted by Fergus)

    The great thing about Brandon's comments is the reasoned backing he gives them. Thanks mate. I recently upgraded to a Motu Ultralite - my 7th external sound card. Now I am happy:) Quality always counts.
     
  • Comment #4 (Posted by rodful)

    your article was well written..i was wondering if at all possible would you be able to answer a question for me..as of today i'am currently using as a c01u usb condenser microphone which does not allow me to monitor my vocals through my headphones..i was wondering if you knew of any usb condenser mics which allowe me to do this..if there are any which allow one to monitor their vocals at all.. also have you any experience with the mxl 990 usb mic?..
     
  • Comment #5 (Posted by Mike)

    Good article. Good supports...

    Rodful,

    I think you missed the whole point behind that article!
    (You might go back and read it before posting your question!)
     
  • Comment #6 (Posted by mike)

    good comments. question. won't a USB mic appear as another input source in Cubase? if so, why can't you monitor it? I can understand how the latency could be an issue though. I have an H4 that functions as a USB mic. I'm recording birds/ planes/ toys etc. I haven't had a problem yet.

     
  • Comment #7 (Posted by Brandon Drury)

    Technically, you could monitor through Cubase, but what would be the output source? The stock soundcard? Then you will be looking at latency times of up to 500ms.

    Granted, you could use a USB microphone with an audio interface you already had, but then you have redundant converters and such.

    In situations where latency is a non-issue, USB microphones are not so bad.
     
  • Comment #8 (Posted by chacalote)

    I can not use a USB microphone to record voice (or acoustic guitar) simultaneously as the pc is playing MIDI. I don't believe it's possible due to latency. That's because MIDI is 'real-time minus slight latency" while the USB mic is way to late. They seem to be mainly RECORDING devices. I don't know even if a digital mic can be used in live singing , as it might not keep pace with the band, or accompaniment. Since I use MIDI software to sing/play-guitar, on an improvisation basis, I just don't think simultaneous recording as I need is possible, except for perhaps very expensive set-up that wouldn't be worth it. Specially when the idea of the USB is to minimize hardware required. Also, the USB mic can not be set to replace the regular mic in the windows or Linux 'mixers'. The USB mics show-up as separate from the "What you hear" mixer.
     
  • Comment #9 (Posted by Edmand)

    For studio, i use an HP Pavilion Entertainment PC with Samson C03U mics which are just plucked into usb ports. u wont bliv the quality of audio produced (Use cubase, audacity and FL Studio XXL Pro Ed. its all about how u use USB mics..althogh cheaper ones suck (just like all cheap things). i have full control coz i did donwload the drivers from samsontech.com
     
  • Comment #10 (Posted by junior)

    i think that usb microphones are good recording mics.they have very good quality sound.there is no latency probly wen using adobe audition.
     
  • Comment #11 (Posted by JACK)

    I felt the same way, but without knowing precisely what you wrote. I never liked the way usb mics sound on recording music. very thin, and impossible to mix. I'm just saying....- jack
     
  • Comment #12 (Posted by Roy Harper)

    I can understand your views on USB microphones. However, as with most problems there is a solution. It was with the Latency issues in mind that we developed the Studio One, and the USB009. Both have zero latency monitoring via onboard headphone sockets. The USB009 is also has true 24/96 A/D converters too. So sound quality is certainly not an issue. Always happy to provide information about our products.
    roy@marshallelectronics.net
     
  • Submit Comment