<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Antares Autotune vs Celemony Melodyne – Pitch Correction Software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/antares-autotune-vs-celemony-melodyne-%e2%80%93-pitch-correction-software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/antares-autotune-vs-celemony-melodyne-%e2%80%93-pitch-correction-software/</link>
	<description>Make Home Recordings Pro Recordings</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 13:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Enanito Verde</title>
		<link>http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/antares-autotune-vs-celemony-melodyne-%e2%80%93-pitch-correction-software/#comment-1476</link>
		<dc:creator>Enanito Verde</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 05:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/antares-autotune-vs-celemony-melodyne-%e2%80%93-pitch-correction-software/#comment-1476</guid>
		<description>Great aricle there Brandon... How about the best of both worlds with Auto-Tune Evo...

Image:
http://www.antarestech.com/images/ATEvo_Graphic_full.jpg

See description here:
http://www.antarestech.com/products/auto-tune-evo.shtml</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great aricle there Brandon&#8230; How about the best of both worlds with Auto-Tune Evo&#8230;</p>
<p>Image:<br />
<a href="http://www.antarestech.com/images/ATEvo_Graphic_full.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.antarestech.com/images/ATEvo_Graphic_full.jpg</a></p>
<p>See description here:<br />
<a href="http://www.antarestech.com/products/auto-tune-evo.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.antarestech.com/products/auto-tune-evo.shtml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miguel</title>
		<link>http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/antares-autotune-vs-celemony-melodyne-%e2%80%93-pitch-correction-software/#comment-1424</link>
		<dc:creator>Miguel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 22:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/antares-autotune-vs-celemony-melodyne-%e2%80%93-pitch-correction-software/#comment-1424</guid>
		<description>Brandon, did you see the new feature in Melodyne?? Direct Note Access!! It's incredible!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brandon, did you see the new feature in Melodyne?? Direct Note Access!! It&#8217;s incredible!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brandondrury</title>
		<link>http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/antares-autotune-vs-celemony-melodyne-%e2%80%93-pitch-correction-software/#comment-1339</link>
		<dc:creator>brandondrury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 10:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/antares-autotune-vs-celemony-melodyne-%e2%80%93-pitch-correction-software/#comment-1339</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;If you tune vocals during tracking you are an idiot.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Wow!  That's a bold statement!  Everyone has their own way of working, so I'd like to hear why you feel so strongly against tuning vocals during tracking process.

I love the idea of once a singer has done a line that has the intensity we want but maybe the notes are a bit shakey, to find out if running it through Auto-tune or Melodyne really quickly will fix the pitch issue.  If tuning the vocal doesn't solve the problem, we know we need to attack that phrase again.

Brandon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If you tune vocals during tracking you are an idiot.</p></blockquote>
<p>Wow!  That&#8217;s a bold statement!  Everyone has their own way of working, so I&#8217;d like to hear why you feel so strongly against tuning vocals during tracking process.</p>
<p>I love the idea of once a singer has done a line that has the intensity we want but maybe the notes are a bit shakey, to find out if running it through Auto-tune or Melodyne really quickly will fix the pitch issue.  If tuning the vocal doesn&#8217;t solve the problem, we know we need to attack that phrase again.</p>
<p>Brandon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry</title>
		<link>http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/antares-autotune-vs-celemony-melodyne-%e2%80%93-pitch-correction-software/#comment-1331</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 12:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/antares-autotune-vs-celemony-melodyne-%e2%80%93-pitch-correction-software/#comment-1331</guid>
		<description>If you tune vocals during tracking you are an idiot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you tune vocals during tracking you are an idiot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jake death</title>
		<link>http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/antares-autotune-vs-celemony-melodyne-%e2%80%93-pitch-correction-software/#comment-1106</link>
		<dc:creator>jake death</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 21:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/antares-autotune-vs-celemony-melodyne-%e2%80%93-pitch-correction-software/#comment-1106</guid>
		<description>good article I better watch what I say here...just read the........ Alright, well you should have said “my convenience” and not “your convenience”.....

Anyway Celemony Melodyne Plugin 2 features DNA (direct note access)  - check it out everybody, it's not out yet but this is going to make history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good article I better watch what I say here&#8230;just read the&#8230;&#8230;.. Alright, well you should have said “my convenience” and not “your convenience”&#8230;..</p>
<p>Anyway Celemony Melodyne Plugin 2 features DNA (direct note access)  - check it out everybody, it&#8217;s not out yet but this is going to make history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richard (from the uk)</title>
		<link>http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/antares-autotune-vs-celemony-melodyne-%e2%80%93-pitch-correction-software/#comment-984</link>
		<dc:creator>richard (from the uk)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 12:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/antares-autotune-vs-celemony-melodyne-%e2%80%93-pitch-correction-software/#comment-984</guid>
		<description>pls tell how u record in real time using autotune and cubase sx3 basically i want to hear the effects before iv even started recording if possible email me ballatoballa@hotmail.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pls tell how u record in real time using autotune and cubase sx3 basically i want to hear the effects before iv even started recording if possible email me <a href="mailto:ballatoballa@hotmail.com">ballatoballa@hotmail.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brandondrury</title>
		<link>http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/antares-autotune-vs-celemony-melodyne-%e2%80%93-pitch-correction-software/#comment-930</link>
		<dc:creator>brandondrury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 21:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/antares-autotune-vs-celemony-melodyne-%e2%80%93-pitch-correction-software/#comment-930</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I find Antares a bit brutal on my vocals so gave up with it. &lt;/blockquote&gt;
The more I use both of them, the more I realize I do like Auto-tune better, actually.  However, I MUST slow down Auto-tune.  The settings in autotune are VERY powerful!

Brandon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I find Antares a bit brutal on my vocals so gave up with it. </p></blockquote>
<p>The more I use both of them, the more I realize I do like Auto-tune better, actually.  However, I MUST slow down Auto-tune.  The settings in autotune are VERY powerful!</p>
<p>Brandon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zena</title>
		<link>http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/antares-autotune-vs-celemony-melodyne-%e2%80%93-pitch-correction-software/#comment-917</link>
		<dc:creator>Zena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 21:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/antares-autotune-vs-celemony-melodyne-%e2%80%93-pitch-correction-software/#comment-917</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the article. I was wondering whether to get melodyne and now I'm trying it out because I find Antares a bit brutal on my vocals so gave up with it. I wanted something to just pitch correct the odd note. Usually the last one on a recording when I'm running out of breath. I have scrapped a few lovely recordings just because the last note tends to go a fraction flat. On the whole though I strive towards delivering a perfect vocal and usually I'm in tune but it's nice to know I can salvage a recording with melodyne:-) And yes I probably am sad for reading your article but thanks anyway. Zena</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the article. I was wondering whether to get melodyne and now I&#8217;m trying it out because I find Antares a bit brutal on my vocals so gave up with it. I wanted something to just pitch correct the odd note. Usually the last one on a recording when I&#8217;m running out of breath. I have scrapped a few lovely recordings just because the last note tends to go a fraction flat. On the whole though I strive towards delivering a perfect vocal and usually I&#8217;m in tune but it&#8217;s nice to know I can salvage a recording with melodyne:-) And yes I probably am sad for reading your article but thanks anyway. Zena</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antill</title>
		<link>http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/antares-autotune-vs-celemony-melodyne-%e2%80%93-pitch-correction-software/#comment-886</link>
		<dc:creator>Antill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 05:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/antares-autotune-vs-celemony-melodyne-%e2%80%93-pitch-correction-software/#comment-886</guid>
		<description>Thanks for posting this article, it's very helpful.  I've been working with Melodyne for a while and haven't had a go at autotune.

For me, Melodyne vocal corrections don't make any sense in the non-plugin context.  Naturally, I have to hear the other lanes and judge by ear what notes are off.  It is true, that I have to first bounce all the best segments to one track before using the tool.

Cheers, Antill</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting this article, it&#8217;s very helpful.  I&#8217;ve been working with Melodyne for a while and haven&#8217;t had a go at autotune.</p>
<p>For me, Melodyne vocal corrections don&#8217;t make any sense in the non-plugin context.  Naturally, I have to hear the other lanes and judge by ear what notes are off.  It is true, that I have to first bounce all the best segments to one track before using the tool.</p>
<p>Cheers, Antill</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: izzme</title>
		<link>http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/antares-autotune-vs-celemony-melodyne-%e2%80%93-pitch-correction-software/#comment-870</link>
		<dc:creator>izzme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/antares-autotune-vs-celemony-melodyne-%e2%80%93-pitch-correction-software/#comment-870</guid>
		<description>all that pitch correction if it was used on robert plants vocals would have robbed him of his incredible uniqueness.i shudder to think of his vocals without all his swoops and pitch bends. uuuuuuuugh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>all that pitch correction if it was used on robert plants vocals would have robbed him of his incredible uniqueness.i shudder to think of his vocals without all his swoops and pitch bends. uuuuuuuugh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
