<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Home Recording Blog &#187; Recording Software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/category/recording-software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.recordingreview.com/blog</link>
	<description>Make Home Recordings Pro Audio Recordings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:04:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Keep Your Friends Close But Your Serial Numbers Closer</title>
		<link>http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/recording-software/friends-close-serial-numbers-closer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/recording-software/friends-close-serial-numbers-closer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 19:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brandondrury</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Recording Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Native Instruments]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/?p=203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I attempted to recover my password for my Native Instruments account, I was forced to enter the serial number of one of my products.  This has gone WAY too far.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Today I tried the unthinkable.  I attempted to update my Native Instruments Komplete 3 files.  I have some nerve!  
I downloaded all necessary files to make sure I had the latest versions.  It turned out I had to re-register them.  For the first time in my life I&#8217;m actually hooking [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/recording-software/friends-close-serial-numbers-closer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cubase 4 In 60 Minutes Review</title>
		<link>http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/recording-software/cubase-4-in-60-minutes-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/recording-software/cubase-4-in-60-minutes-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 17:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brandondrury</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Recording Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cubase 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cubase Instruction]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/?p=118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Finding Cubase 4 difficult to learn?  The guys at 60minSoftware.com have a solution for you and it just happens to be a lot better and MORE FUN than you may be thinking.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[The Problem:  Learning all the ins and outs of Cubase 4 can be a bit intimidating.  Many people feel that Cubase is complicated.  
The OTHER Problem:  When you purchase instructional material to “enhance” the Cubase Getting Started guides, you usually get Ben Stein, only worse!  After viewing some instructional videos [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/recording-software/cubase-4-in-60-minutes-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>User Friendly Recording Software</title>
		<link>http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/recording-software/user-friendly-recording-software/</link>
		<comments>http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/recording-software/user-friendly-recording-software/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 22:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brandondrury</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Recording Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/?p=85</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you are looking for the easiest recording software, this article is for you.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[While I&#8217;ve touched on this topic, I want to hit it head on in this brief article.  I see a ton of newbies in the recording world asking about “user friendly software”.  If you are looking for user friendly software, this article is for you.
What recording software is user friendly?  Easy! All [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/recording-software/user-friendly-recording-software/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digidesign Pro Tools:  Rethinking The Industry Standard Mentality</title>
		<link>http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/recording-software/digidesign-pro-tools-rethinking-the-industry-standard-mentality/</link>
		<comments>http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/recording-software/digidesign-pro-tools-rethinking-the-industry-standard-mentality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 23:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brandondrury</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Recording Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cubase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro Tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/digidesign-pro-tools-rethinking-the-industry-standard-mentality/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is no doubting that Digidesign Pro Tools is the undisputed most popular recording application in the pro studio realm.  This article will discuss why I don't think Pro Tools is the champion in the home studio realm.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Let&#8217;s talk about “industry standards” for a minute.  Here are a few arbitrary standards for big boy robo studios I just came up with off the top of my head without any real thought put into them.
Bull Crap Industry Standards
Studio Design and Construction $2,000,000
Console $200,000
Studio Monitors $5,000
Mic Collection $100,000
External Mic Preamps $30,000
Compressors $30,000
Pro Tools [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/recording-software/digidesign-pro-tools-rethinking-the-industry-standard-mentality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Toontrack DFH Superior Drum Sample Discontinued?</title>
		<link>http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/recording-software/toontrack-dfh-superior-drum-sample-discontinued/</link>
		<comments>http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/recording-software/toontrack-dfh-superior-drum-sample-discontinued/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 18:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brandondrury</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Recording Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DFH C&V]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DFH Superior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EZdrummer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/toontrack-dfh-superior-drum-sample-discontinued/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just found out that Toontrack has discontinued the popular DFH Superior drum sample package.  Does anyone know why?
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Someone on the recording forum mentioned that electronic drums still sound synthesized.  I started to send him over the the Toontrack website so he could hear what the Toontrack drums sounded like with a real drummer trigger KILLER drum samples.    
To my surprise, I see that DFH Superior has been discontinued. [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/recording-software/toontrack-dfh-superior-drum-sample-discontinued/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>There Is NOTHING Complicated About Cubase</title>
		<link>http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/recording-software/there-is-nothing-complicated-about-cubase/</link>
		<comments>http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/recording-software/there-is-nothing-complicated-about-cubase/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 14:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>brandondrury</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Recording Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cubase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Performer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Logic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pro Tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sonar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steinberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SX3]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/there-is-nothing-complicated-about-cubase/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I've heard countless times on my recording forum here at recordingreview.com that Cubase is somehow more complicated than the other recording software out there.  Steinberg has created killer tools for creating music and I consider Cubase to be incredible.  This blog is meant to shoot down any ideas that Cubase is “complicated”.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[I wish I had a million dollars given to me every time a person in the recording forum  mentioned Cubase being complicated.  I&#8217;d be rich!  I guess that&#8217;s a given.  However, I&#8217;d be rich, if I had a dollar every time someone said that Cubase was complicated, I&#8217;d still be rich!
It [...]]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/recording-software/there-is-nothing-complicated-about-cubase/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
