<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Changes At RecordingReview.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/changes-at-recordingreviewcom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/changes-at-recordingreviewcom/</link>
	<description>Make Home Recordings Pro Recordings</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 10:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: brandondrury</title>
		<link>http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/changes-at-recordingreviewcom/#comment-1022</link>
		<dc:creator>brandondrury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 15:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/changes-at-recordingreviewcom/#comment-1022</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Rather than ditching the glossary, I wish it could be centrally located on the site (in everyone’s face, possibly with a linked tab) rather than in hard copy form&lt;/blockquote&gt;  
You may be right, but it's too late to change my decision now.  

Brandon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Rather than ditching the glossary, I wish it could be centrally located on the site (in everyone’s face, possibly with a linked tab) rather than in hard copy form</p></blockquote>
<p>You may be right, but it&#8217;s too late to change my decision now.  </p>
<p>Brandon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Morrison</title>
		<link>http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/changes-at-recordingreviewcom/#comment-1005</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Morrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 20:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/changes-at-recordingreviewcom/#comment-1005</guid>
		<description>Hey Brandon,

I agree with Andy: Best danged site on the planet! Since I discovered it only 2 days ago, I've been turning everybody and their dog onto it. (Dogs hear better.)

Rather than ditching the glossary, I wish it could be centrally located on the site (in everyone's face, possibly with a linked tab) rather than in hard copy form (which would be easy to misplace and hard to keep revised with the ever-changing digital world). I know you said something about it not working out for some reason, hence the desire to nuke it. But if it were kept, linking to common terms in our posts would be totally awesome. Like when I wrote a post just recently and said something in passing about an SM57, I was totally blown away to see it automatically linked to a photo of an SM57, along with yours and others' description/rating of it. How cool is that! Reminded me of a local Wikipedia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Brandon,</p>
<p>I agree with Andy: Best danged site on the planet! Since I discovered it only 2 days ago, I&#8217;ve been turning everybody and their dog onto it. (Dogs hear better.)</p>
<p>Rather than ditching the glossary, I wish it could be centrally located on the site (in everyone&#8217;s face, possibly with a linked tab) rather than in hard copy form (which would be easy to misplace and hard to keep revised with the ever-changing digital world). I know you said something about it not working out for some reason, hence the desire to nuke it. But if it were kept, linking to common terms in our posts would be totally awesome. Like when I wrote a post just recently and said something in passing about an SM57, I was totally blown away to see it automatically linked to a photo of an SM57, along with yours and others&#8217; description/rating of it. How cool is that! Reminded me of a local Wikipedia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/changes-at-recordingreviewcom/#comment-865</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 14:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/changes-at-recordingreviewcom/#comment-865</guid>
		<description>Don't be too hard on yourself, mate. It's the best site out there.

Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t be too hard on yourself, mate. It&#8217;s the best site out there.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marcus</title>
		<link>http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/changes-at-recordingreviewcom/#comment-725</link>
		<dc:creator>marcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 05:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/changes-at-recordingreviewcom/#comment-725</guid>
		<description>ok, sounds good. looking for the new and better web site buddy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok, sounds good. looking for the new and better web site buddy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
