<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Departing With M-Audio Delta 1010 Audio Interfaces</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/departing-with-m-audio-delta-1010-audio-interfaces/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/departing-with-m-audio-delta-1010-audio-interfaces/</link>
	<description>Make Home Recordings Pro Recordings</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: philicorda</title>
		<link>http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/departing-with-m-audio-delta-1010-audio-interfaces/#comment-1437</link>
		<dc:creator>philicorda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 16:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/departing-with-m-audio-delta-1010-audio-interfaces/#comment-1437</guid>
		<description>The 1010 has slightly better converter chips and lower noise than the 1010lt.

I've just been through the same process as you, going from two 1010 PCI to a Presonus Firestudio. I bought a Digimax FS for another 8 ins as well.

How do you find the preamps on the Firestudio? I'd say that a SM57 sounds better than my old system of a Mackie 24-8-2 into my 1010s. There is not a huge amount in it though, and I'd think it is slightly noisier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 1010 has slightly better converter chips and lower noise than the 1010lt.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve just been through the same process as you, going from two 1010 PCI to a Presonus Firestudio. I bought a Digimax FS for another 8 ins as well.</p>
<p>How do you find the preamps on the Firestudio? I&#8217;d say that a SM57 sounds better than my old system of a Mackie 24-8-2 into my 1010s. There is not a huge amount in it though, and I&#8217;d think it is slightly noisier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brandondrury</title>
		<link>http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/departing-with-m-audio-delta-1010-audio-interfaces/#comment-703</link>
		<dc:creator>brandondrury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 01:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/departing-with-m-audio-delta-1010-audio-interfaces/#comment-703</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;sounds like you’re being too hard on the 1010’s.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I wasn't being hard on the Delta 1010s.  They've been great to me for years.  I have no complains about them, per say, but their features are what you would expect in 2001, not 2008.  That's all.  

I recommend the Delta 1010 to anyone that gets their needs met by them, but for about the same amount of money their are great options out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>sounds like you’re being too hard on the 1010’s.</p></blockquote>
<p>I wasn&#8217;t being hard on the Delta 1010s.  They&#8217;ve been great to me for years.  I have no complains about them, per say, but their features are what you would expect in 2001, not 2008.  That&#8217;s all.  </p>
<p>I recommend the Delta 1010 to anyone that gets their needs met by them, but for about the same amount of money their are great options out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/departing-with-m-audio-delta-1010-audio-interfaces/#comment-695</link>
		<dc:creator>John Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 18:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/departing-with-m-audio-delta-1010-audio-interfaces/#comment-695</guid>
		<description>sounds like you're being too hard on the 1010's.  i got the cheaper version (the 1010LT without the breakout box) on ebay for $150 and it's been great for 2 years now.  there are 8 outputs and a simple monitor mixer, so depending on monitoring you can rig 3 other stereo mixes and plug headphones in through an adapter.  and there are built in preamps on the first two inputs, complete with xlr inputs on the back.

after looking it up, it looks like the cheaper version has the preamps, while yours didn't.  weird.  in any case, 2 is hardly enough</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sounds like you&#8217;re being too hard on the 1010&#8217;s.  i got the cheaper version (the 1010LT without the breakout box) on ebay for $150 and it&#8217;s been great for 2 years now.  there are 8 outputs and a simple monitor mixer, so depending on monitoring you can rig 3 other stereo mixes and plug headphones in through an adapter.  and there are built in preamps on the first two inputs, complete with xlr inputs on the back.</p>
<p>after looking it up, it looks like the cheaper version has the preamps, while yours didn&#8217;t.  weird.  in any case, 2 is hardly enough</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just Ordered Presonus Firestudio - Firewire Audio Interface &#124; Home Recording Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/departing-with-m-audio-delta-1010-audio-interfaces/#comment-681</link>
		<dc:creator>Just Ordered Presonus Firestudio - Firewire Audio Interface &#124; Home Recording Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/departing-with-m-audio-delta-1010-audio-interfaces/#comment-681</guid>
		<description>[...] Tools            &#171; Departing With M-Audio Delta 1010 Audio Interfaces [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tools            &laquo; Departing With M-Audio Delta 1010 Audio Interfaces [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
