<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digidesign Pro Tools:  Rethinking The Industry Standard Mentality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/digidesign-pro-tools-rethinking-the-industry-standard-mentality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/digidesign-pro-tools-rethinking-the-industry-standard-mentality/</link>
	<description>Make Home Recordings Pro Recordings</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 10:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ray Allin</title>
		<link>http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/digidesign-pro-tools-rethinking-the-industry-standard-mentality/#comment-1270</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Allin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 09:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/digidesign-pro-tools-rethinking-the-industry-standard-mentality/#comment-1270</guid>
		<description>As a Pro tools M powered customer I find myself eternally frustrated with Avid/Digidesign.

Because Digidesign limits the hardware you can use from digidesign or m-audio, your choices for a moderately effective live recording studio at modern sample rates are very limited unless you want to spend $20 grand for an HD3 system.

Although CD's are recorded at 16bit 44.1  the nyquist laws and most any decent mastering studio will tell you to record at a minimum of 24bit/96khz so that all those nice digital effects that do bit dropping and wave averaging have a higher quality signal to work with before dither. Don't you think there is a reason they make interfaces going up to 192khz....most will agree 96k is the ideal minimum sampling rate to capture optimal data while keeping track size &#38; count managable for modern computing systems.

protools le/mpowered is limited to 24/96 ah, but how to do it...read on.

If you want to record a band live in the studio you need at 4-8 mics for drums , 2-4 for guitar, maybee 2 for vocals one for analog keys, 1 for bass  so 16 -18 simultaneous inputs are about right.  You also need the ability to monitor the inputs with minimal latency.

If you go Protool LE you must use the 002/003 series which is only 8 preamps... yes you can expand via adat but there is only a single adat permitting your additional 8 channels at a max resolution of 48khz so even though the first 8 channel A/d's can do 96k if you want to use all 16 inputs simultaniously your max sample rate will be 48k which won't get you the quality.

If you go Protools M powered, and use any of their mbox series forget about more than 1 or 2 inputs.... so your going to have to move up to their new Profire 2626 or Profire Lightbridge. 

The Profire 2626 has your first 8 channels covered for preamps &#38; A/d up to 192khz (96k max in pro tools).... but it only has 2 adat inputs which in Smux mode will allow 8 channel inputs @96k output from another A/d with smux out like a mackie 800r or Digimax FS  or another Profire 2626  so this WILL allow you to get your maximum 16 simultaneous inputs@96 and possibly one more via spidf making 17.

The other option is the Profire Lightbridge which has 4adat inputs and will permit 16 channels of 24/96 in smux letting you choose your own preamps/ad and 1 more channel via smux so 17 if your lucky (the mixer matrix on mine won't let me select the smux output option without causing other problems)

Oh, By the way the LE systems offer low latency monitoring...the Mpowered do not so if  you want the drummer to hear himself better run him through a seperate mixer as the slightest latency by monitoring through the computer will throw the drummers time off since he's dealing with fast transients.

OK so now that i've proven how expensive and difficult it is to setup a lousy project studio to record a live band.... next is the fact that to export to OMF is extra, if you want more than 32 tracks you need to drop anothr $500 on their DV toolkit for LE or Music Production Tool Kit for Mpowered...oh and you must use expensive RTAS plugins unless you buy a wrapper program..... and your system will only come with a limited amount of effects or instruments and almost no sound samples.

Oh, did I mention there is no auto latency compensation....so your gonna have to sync up your tracks manually..... Even though every other major software has it....and to top it all off if you mix for movies forget it,  you can't do dolby 5.1 in either LE or M powered.

Then there's support... after your first 30 days your gonna pay what some ungodly fee like $6bucks a minute for telephonic support or you can attempt to navigate the Avid Website for support but navigating that mess is Gods personal mystery.... they have so many releases and so many hardware configs and so many updates that you need a degree to figure out how to navigate their website or upgrade your Ilok (the monstrosity of a security system dongel they use for mpowered products).... Oh and if you ever want to buy a used system look out, a $25 registration transfer fee for most programs from digidesign and another $25 Ilok transfer fee to transfer a license to your dongle key.


Well if your still reading boys and girls I would say go buy if you have an apple buy LOGIC STUDIO  for $500 bucks you get world class software, gigs of sound samples, free didgital instruments, tons of plugins and more band for your buck and no limit as to what hardware you can choose or be limited to 32 tracks.

And to Avid...if you actually read these blogs..... few people go straight to the top...the majority do it in stages as time/money permits.  If you don't create a smooth transition from home studio to project studio to high end studio and continue to have so many products that you lose focus and continue to create an ongoing nightmare, if you continue to deprecate your software then you deserve to lose your market share.

Happy Recording....

Ray Allin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Pro tools M powered customer I find myself eternally frustrated with Avid/Digidesign.</p>
<p>Because Digidesign limits the hardware you can use from digidesign or m-audio, your choices for a moderately effective live recording studio at modern sample rates are very limited unless you want to spend $20 grand for an HD3 system.</p>
<p>Although CD&#8217;s are recorded at 16bit 44.1  the nyquist laws and most any decent mastering studio will tell you to record at a minimum of 24bit/96khz so that all those nice digital effects that do bit dropping and wave averaging have a higher quality signal to work with before dither. Don&#8217;t you think there is a reason they make interfaces going up to 192khz&#8230;.most will agree 96k is the ideal minimum sampling rate to capture optimal data while keeping track size &amp; count managable for modern computing systems.</p>
<p>protools le/mpowered is limited to 24/96 ah, but how to do it&#8230;read on.</p>
<p>If you want to record a band live in the studio you need at 4-8 mics for drums , 2-4 for guitar, maybee 2 for vocals one for analog keys, 1 for bass  so 16 -18 simultaneous inputs are about right.  You also need the ability to monitor the inputs with minimal latency.</p>
<p>If you go Protool LE you must use the 002/003 series which is only 8 preamps&#8230; yes you can expand via adat but there is only a single adat permitting your additional 8 channels at a max resolution of 48khz so even though the first 8 channel A/d&#8217;s can do 96k if you want to use all 16 inputs simultaniously your max sample rate will be 48k which won&#8217;t get you the quality.</p>
<p>If you go Protools M powered, and use any of their mbox series forget about more than 1 or 2 inputs&#8230;. so your going to have to move up to their new Profire 2626 or Profire Lightbridge. </p>
<p>The Profire 2626 has your first 8 channels covered for preamps &amp; A/d up to 192khz (96k max in pro tools)&#8230;. but it only has 2 adat inputs which in Smux mode will allow 8 channel inputs @96k output from another A/d with smux out like a mackie 800r or Digimax FS  or another Profire 2626  so this WILL allow you to get your maximum 16 simultaneous inputs@96 and possibly one more via spidf making 17.</p>
<p>The other option is the Profire Lightbridge which has 4adat inputs and will permit 16 channels of 24/96 in smux letting you choose your own preamps/ad and 1 more channel via smux so 17 if your lucky (the mixer matrix on mine won&#8217;t let me select the smux output option without causing other problems)</p>
<p>Oh, By the way the LE systems offer low latency monitoring&#8230;the Mpowered do not so if  you want the drummer to hear himself better run him through a seperate mixer as the slightest latency by monitoring through the computer will throw the drummers time off since he&#8217;s dealing with fast transients.</p>
<p>OK so now that i&#8217;ve proven how expensive and difficult it is to setup a lousy project studio to record a live band&#8230;. next is the fact that to export to OMF is extra, if you want more than 32 tracks you need to drop anothr $500 on their DV toolkit for LE or Music Production Tool Kit for Mpowered&#8230;oh and you must use expensive RTAS plugins unless you buy a wrapper program&#8230;.. and your system will only come with a limited amount of effects or instruments and almost no sound samples.</p>
<p>Oh, did I mention there is no auto latency compensation&#8230;.so your gonna have to sync up your tracks manually&#8230;.. Even though every other major software has it&#8230;.and to top it all off if you mix for movies forget it,  you can&#8217;t do dolby 5.1 in either LE or M powered.</p>
<p>Then there&#8217;s support&#8230; after your first 30 days your gonna pay what some ungodly fee like $6bucks a minute for telephonic support or you can attempt to navigate the Avid Website for support but navigating that mess is Gods personal mystery&#8230;. they have so many releases and so many hardware configs and so many updates that you need a degree to figure out how to navigate their website or upgrade your Ilok (the monstrosity of a security system dongel they use for mpowered products)&#8230;. Oh and if you ever want to buy a used system look out, a $25 registration transfer fee for most programs from digidesign and another $25 Ilok transfer fee to transfer a license to your dongle key.</p>
<p>Well if your still reading boys and girls I would say go buy if you have an apple buy LOGIC STUDIO  for $500 bucks you get world class software, gigs of sound samples, free didgital instruments, tons of plugins and more band for your buck and no limit as to what hardware you can choose or be limited to 32 tracks.</p>
<p>And to Avid&#8230;if you actually read these blogs&#8230;.. few people go straight to the top&#8230;the majority do it in stages as time/money permits.  If you don&#8217;t create a smooth transition from home studio to project studio to high end studio and continue to have so many products that you lose focus and continue to create an ongoing nightmare, if you continue to deprecate your software then you deserve to lose your market share.</p>
<p>Happy Recording&#8230;.</p>
<p>Ray Allin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Fenton</title>
		<link>http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/digidesign-pro-tools-rethinking-the-industry-standard-mentality/#comment-1243</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Fenton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 17:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/digidesign-pro-tools-rethinking-the-industry-standard-mentality/#comment-1243</guid>
		<description>good article, makes me even happier with cubase!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good article, makes me even happier with cubase!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Wolff</title>
		<link>http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/digidesign-pro-tools-rethinking-the-industry-standard-mentality/#comment-1209</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Wolff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 13:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/digidesign-pro-tools-rethinking-the-industry-standard-mentality/#comment-1209</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your article!!!

To the pro tools religious followers....

I´ve been working with DAWS for more than 10 years and I know pretty well almost every major software and I´m positive about this : Pro tools is an arrogant piece of software. They called themselves "the Industry standard" but if you really know something about DAWS, you will see how the "intuitive Pro tools interface" is really OLD, no intuitive at all, and the WORST and most abrupt thing for me: the disabled OMF function. How can be restricted a function themselves created so many years ago? that is nothing else but an obscure intent to deny to the blinded pro tools users, a really obvious thing: THERE ARE MANY THINGS BETTER OUTSIDE PRO TOOLS WORLD.
Pro tools WAS great... yes, WAS, but the world has changed a lot since the the time Pro tool was almost the only "PRO" software on stage.
From my experience, I can say that NUENDO, CUBASE, DIGITAL PERFORMER, LOGIC, EVEN SONAR are really great options with a LOT OF MORE POSSIBILITIES, AND THE MOST IMPORTANT THING IN THE REAL WORLD: the AFFORDABLE part.

You can fool yourself spending more than $1000 bucks buying a really LIMITED version of Pro Tools or you can be wise and RE-THINK about what you really NEED and what you´ll really GET with the "LE" VERSION of a company with the worst costumer service in the industry. (that is their true standard... ask your friends in "need" if you think I don´t like pro tools for free) 

Final thought: the great sound resides in your knowledge about every step in your "sound chain", your vision of what you want and, in your ears, finally. If you think the good sound is only the sub-product of a software, please think again about your career.

PEACE.

Richard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your article!!!</p>
<p>To the pro tools religious followers&#8230;.</p>
<p>I´ve been working with DAWS for more than 10 years and I know pretty well almost every major software and I´m positive about this : Pro tools is an arrogant piece of software. They called themselves &#8220;the Industry standard&#8221; but if you really know something about DAWS, you will see how the &#8220;intuitive Pro tools interface&#8221; is really OLD, no intuitive at all, and the WORST and most abrupt thing for me: the disabled OMF function. How can be restricted a function themselves created so many years ago? that is nothing else but an obscure intent to deny to the blinded pro tools users, a really obvious thing: THERE ARE MANY THINGS BETTER OUTSIDE PRO TOOLS WORLD.<br />
Pro tools WAS great&#8230; yes, WAS, but the world has changed a lot since the the time Pro tool was almost the only &#8220;PRO&#8221; software on stage.<br />
From my experience, I can say that NUENDO, CUBASE, DIGITAL PERFORMER, LOGIC, EVEN SONAR are really great options with a LOT OF MORE POSSIBILITIES, AND THE MOST IMPORTANT THING IN THE REAL WORLD: the AFFORDABLE part.</p>
<p>You can fool yourself spending more than $1000 bucks buying a really LIMITED version of Pro Tools or you can be wise and RE-THINK about what you really NEED and what you´ll really GET with the &#8220;LE&#8221; VERSION of a company with the worst costumer service in the industry. (that is their true standard&#8230; ask your friends in &#8220;need&#8221; if you think I don´t like pro tools for free) </p>
<p>Final thought: the great sound resides in your knowledge about every step in your &#8220;sound chain&#8221;, your vision of what you want and, in your ears, finally. If you think the good sound is only the sub-product of a software, please think again about your career.</p>
<p>PEACE.</p>
<p>Richard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Hervig</title>
		<link>http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/digidesign-pro-tools-rethinking-the-industry-standard-mentality/#comment-1194</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Hervig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 04:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/digidesign-pro-tools-rethinking-the-industry-standard-mentality/#comment-1194</guid>
		<description>A great article...since I am new to this field, I would absolutely love a “Home Recording Software Wizard” to help me choose. I look forward to hearing more.

dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A great article&#8230;since I am new to this field, I would absolutely love a “Home Recording Software Wizard” to help me choose. I look forward to hearing more.</p>
<p>dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Beehler</title>
		<link>http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/digidesign-pro-tools-rethinking-the-industry-standard-mentality/#comment-1150</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Beehler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 03:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/digidesign-pro-tools-rethinking-the-industry-standard-mentality/#comment-1150</guid>
		<description>I have mixed feelings about PT....although it is the system I primarily use for recording, it has a number of serious shortcomings, most glaring being the track limitation and the stupidity of having to shell out 500 bucks for more tracks, mp3 capability,being forced to buy thier interface etc...however, i still think it has the most efficient editing capability of the DAW's I have used (I am fluent with Cubase, Sonar and Performer also)and I have never noticed any significant differences in audio quality between any of the programs. I also agree that the sequencer in PT is not the best, and I long ago switched to Reason to handle that task. If I had to do it over again, I would think long and hard about making PT my primary platform, and I frankly don't think that it offers the best value in this competitive field, especially for the recording novice. It will be interesting to see if Digidesign/Avid responds to these obvious challenges. I realize they are still probably #1 around the world, but  to maintain that position I feel they really need to respond to the competetion offering far more bang for the buck than they currently do. I think offering unlimited tracks (for both new users and as a free upgrade for previous versions)would be a huge step in the right direction. If the price of Logic for example,  can be cut in half, with a significant UPGRADE in features, I cannot see how this could pose much difficulty at all, and would create an enormous amount of goodwill. Is anyone at Digi listening?

Frank</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have mixed feelings about PT&#8230;.although it is the system I primarily use for recording, it has a number of serious shortcomings, most glaring being the track limitation and the stupidity of having to shell out 500 bucks for more tracks, mp3 capability,being forced to buy thier interface etc&#8230;however, i still think it has the most efficient editing capability of the DAW&#8217;s I have used (I am fluent with Cubase, Sonar and Performer also)and I have never noticed any significant differences in audio quality between any of the programs. I also agree that the sequencer in PT is not the best, and I long ago switched to Reason to handle that task. If I had to do it over again, I would think long and hard about making PT my primary platform, and I frankly don&#8217;t think that it offers the best value in this competitive field, especially for the recording novice. It will be interesting to see if Digidesign/Avid responds to these obvious challenges. I realize they are still probably #1 around the world, but  to maintain that position I feel they really need to respond to the competetion offering far more bang for the buck than they currently do. I think offering unlimited tracks (for both new users and as a free upgrade for previous versions)would be a huge step in the right direction. If the price of Logic for example,  can be cut in half, with a significant UPGRADE in features, I cannot see how this could pose much difficulty at all, and would create an enormous amount of goodwill. Is anyone at Digi listening?</p>
<p>Frank</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Vaughan</title>
		<link>http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/digidesign-pro-tools-rethinking-the-industry-standard-mentality/#comment-1146</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Vaughan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 00:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/digidesign-pro-tools-rethinking-the-industry-standard-mentality/#comment-1146</guid>
		<description>Pro results are what pros get no matter how they record, mix, edit or master.  That said, PT is probably not the best bargain for most of us:  Most of us would rather not pay through the nose for 'add-ons' that are stock inclusions with other apps.  And really, you can do the same work with Reaper, Sonar, Sam, Cubase or n-Track (n- if you can get by the bugs!!).  Myself, I'd rather record to something other than my computer in the first place!  But right now I have no choice... things change... anyway the music, the feel for what you're doing and the technique is in you, not the software.  Right?  Of course.

Get what you need, like the man said.  What do you want to do?  Get what you have to get, and get on with making music (I think I'm quoting Marcus Miller here- whomever, it's to the point!).  Maybe ProTools is the answer if it fits your life and plans.  Now that "Wizard" thing is a great idea...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pro results are what pros get no matter how they record, mix, edit or master.  That said, PT is probably not the best bargain for most of us:  Most of us would rather not pay through the nose for &#8216;add-ons&#8217; that are stock inclusions with other apps.  And really, you can do the same work with Reaper, Sonar, Sam, Cubase or n-Track (n- if you can get by the bugs!!).  Myself, I&#8217;d rather record to something other than my computer in the first place!  But right now I have no choice&#8230; things change&#8230; anyway the music, the feel for what you&#8217;re doing and the technique is in you, not the software.  Right?  Of course.</p>
<p>Get what you need, like the man said.  What do you want to do?  Get what you have to get, and get on with making music (I think I&#8217;m quoting Marcus Miller here- whomever, it&#8217;s to the point!).  Maybe ProTools is the answer if it fits your life and plans.  Now that &#8220;Wizard&#8221; thing is a great idea&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy</title>
		<link>http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/digidesign-pro-tools-rethinking-the-industry-standard-mentality/#comment-1143</link>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 21:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/digidesign-pro-tools-rethinking-the-industry-standard-mentality/#comment-1143</guid>
		<description>personally i love to work with pro tools. LE isn't that bad. i love the layout, being able to drag+drop files into the track windows and it does streamline the whole process nicely. but the hardware...give me a feakin' break!  it's way way too proprietary for my liking. now i have to go out and spend 1200 bucks just to get some more inputs, when i can find a presonus firepod for under 600...lame. on top of that, i'm just a little peaved that they can't come out with a new apple 10.5 update in a decent amount of time. perhaps it's apple's fault by releasing new os's at every waking moment of their lives, be it a major or minor release. but seriously, a company with that kind of income should have people working on that sort of thing day and night from the moment it releases. sorry, just hadda vent a little.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>personally i love to work with pro tools. LE isn&#8217;t that bad. i love the layout, being able to drag+drop files into the track windows and it does streamline the whole process nicely. but the hardware&#8230;give me a feakin&#8217; break!  it&#8217;s way way too proprietary for my liking. now i have to go out and spend 1200 bucks just to get some more inputs, when i can find a presonus firepod for under 600&#8230;lame. on top of that, i&#8217;m just a little peaved that they can&#8217;t come out with a new apple 10.5 update in a decent amount of time. perhaps it&#8217;s apple&#8217;s fault by releasing new os&#8217;s at every waking moment of their lives, be it a major or minor release. but seriously, a company with that kind of income should have people working on that sort of thing day and night from the moment it releases. sorry, just hadda vent a little.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Morrison</title>
		<link>http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/digidesign-pro-tools-rethinking-the-industry-standard-mentality/#comment-1105</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Morrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 20:23:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/digidesign-pro-tools-rethinking-the-industry-standard-mentality/#comment-1105</guid>
		<description>Regarding music notation, Avid, which owns Digidesign, Pro Tools, and a number of third-world countries (just kidding), also owns Sibelious, the music notation software company. You may want to contact Digidesign or check the forums. Here's this: http://www.digidesign.com/index.cfm?itemid=5062&#38;mkt=ALL

...and this:

http://www.sibelius.com/home/index_flash.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding music notation, Avid, which owns Digidesign, Pro Tools, and a number of third-world countries (just kidding), also owns Sibelious, the music notation software company. You may want to contact Digidesign or check the forums. Here&#8217;s this: <a href="http://www.digidesign.com/index.cfm?itemid=5062&amp;mkt=ALL" rel="nofollow">http://www.digidesign.com/index.cfm?itemid=5062&amp;mkt=ALL</a></p>
<p>&#8230;and this:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sibelius.com/home/index_flash.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.sibelius.com/home/index_flash.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bilco</title>
		<link>http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/digidesign-pro-tools-rethinking-the-industry-standard-mentality/#comment-1104</link>
		<dc:creator>bilco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 20:11:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/digidesign-pro-tools-rethinking-the-industry-standard-mentality/#comment-1104</guid>
		<description>"As they say in Office Space, “I’m going to have to go ahead and sort of disagree with you” on high track counts being equated to overproduction. Hundreds of tracks get chalked up in post production, most of which you never hear at the same time, nor do you want to combine these unrelated track’s “regions” into single tracks for the sake of categorization, not to mention the fact that realtime plugins are track-specific, not region-specific (without getting into a lot of complicated plugin automation within a single track). Music track counts can get high for the same reason. I just did some voiceover stuff, and I maxed out my track voices in a heartbeat."

That's a good point; I don't know anything about post production work and I hadn't thought of that.

That is a drag about limiting the external drives that it is compatible with.....

Right now I am wishing I had a DAW program that had notation built into it.  I am in the middle of trying to right a worship song that I want to copyright and put out on the web with a lead sheet.  My notation skills were never great and now they are completely gone.  I can play the melody on a MIDI keyboard and export the MIDI file, then import it into Finale Notepad, but in my perfect world, whatever DAW software I use would have everything PT LE has, plus built in notation.......

bilco</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As they say in Office Space, “I’m going to have to go ahead and sort of disagree with you” on high track counts being equated to overproduction. Hundreds of tracks get chalked up in post production, most of which you never hear at the same time, nor do you want to combine these unrelated track’s “regions” into single tracks for the sake of categorization, not to mention the fact that realtime plugins are track-specific, not region-specific (without getting into a lot of complicated plugin automation within a single track). Music track counts can get high for the same reason. I just did some voiceover stuff, and I maxed out my track voices in a heartbeat.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a good point; I don&#8217;t know anything about post production work and I hadn&#8217;t thought of that.</p>
<p>That is a drag about limiting the external drives that it is compatible with&#8230;..</p>
<p>Right now I am wishing I had a DAW program that had notation built into it.  I am in the middle of trying to right a worship song that I want to copyright and put out on the web with a lead sheet.  My notation skills were never great and now they are completely gone.  I can play the melody on a MIDI keyboard and export the MIDI file, then import it into Finale Notepad, but in my perfect world, whatever DAW software I use would have everything PT LE has, plus built in notation&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>bilco</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Morrison</title>
		<link>http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/digidesign-pro-tools-rethinking-the-industry-standard-mentality/#comment-1103</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Morrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 20:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.recordingreview.com/blog/digidesign-pro-tools-rethinking-the-industry-standard-mentality/#comment-1103</guid>
		<description>Hey Bilco,

Yeah, a regular thread would have been nice for this topic, but when you jump in on a blog, it's courier font city... IF A POOR GUY WANTS TO YELL, HE'S REDUCED TO USING CAPS, FOR CRYING OUT LOUD!!!

I'm glad you like Pro Tools. And that's great to hear that Digidesign is listening. I personally went through communication-hell with them just this past month trying to get my LE 7.4 installed on Windows Vista Home Premium (Vista Home What? Vista Prairie Home Companion did you say?), though bless their hearts they did try to be helpful in their own way. (I try to be a patient man.) By the way, it really frosts me that with version 7.4, some genius at Pro Tools decided to eliminate support for FAT32 external drives, which Mac OS seems to be ok with. (They already nuked USB because "it's too slow compared to Firewire". Gimme a break.) This really paints us into a corner for cross-platform compatibility. But regarding communication, our instructor here at film school actually wrote some of their text books, and even he has expressed frustration in communicating with them on numerous occasions.

I think whoever made the statement about the "Beat Detective" thing may have gotten it confused with the multi-track version, which is a purchased option. You're right about the single-track version being included. And it's a very cool plugin, by the way.

As they say in Office Space, "I'm going to have to go ahead and sort of disagree with you" on high track counts being equated to overproduction. Hundreds of tracks get chalked up in post production, most of which you never hear at the same time, nor do you want to combine these unrelated track's "regions" into single tracks for the sake of categorization, not to mention the fact that realtime plugins are track-specific, not region-specific (without getting into a lot of complicated plugin automation within a single track). Music track counts can get high for the same reason. I just did some voiceover stuff, and I maxed out my track voices in a heartbeat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Bilco,</p>
<p>Yeah, a regular thread would have been nice for this topic, but when you jump in on a blog, it&#8217;s courier font city&#8230; IF A POOR GUY WANTS TO YELL, HE&#8217;S REDUCED TO USING CAPS, FOR CRYING OUT LOUD!!!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad you like Pro Tools. And that&#8217;s great to hear that Digidesign is listening. I personally went through communication-hell with them just this past month trying to get my LE 7.4 installed on Windows Vista Home Premium (Vista Home What? Vista Prairie Home Companion did you say?), though bless their hearts they did try to be helpful in their own way. (I try to be a patient man.) By the way, it really frosts me that with version 7.4, some genius at Pro Tools decided to eliminate support for FAT32 external drives, which Mac OS seems to be ok with. (They already nuked USB because &#8220;it&#8217;s too slow compared to Firewire&#8221;. Gimme a break.) This really paints us into a corner for cross-platform compatibility. But regarding communication, our instructor here at film school actually wrote some of their text books, and even he has expressed frustration in communicating with them on numerous occasions.</p>
<p>I think whoever made the statement about the &#8220;Beat Detective&#8221; thing may have gotten it confused with the multi-track version, which is a purchased option. You&#8217;re right about the single-track version being included. And it&#8217;s a very cool plugin, by the way.</p>
<p>As they say in Office Space, &#8220;I&#8217;m going to have to go ahead and sort of disagree with you&#8221; on high track counts being equated to overproduction. Hundreds of tracks get chalked up in post production, most of which you never hear at the same time, nor do you want to combine these unrelated track&#8217;s &#8220;regions&#8221; into single tracks for the sake of categorization, not to mention the fact that realtime plugins are track-specific, not region-specific (without getting into a lot of complicated plugin automation within a single track). Music track counts can get high for the same reason. I just did some voiceover stuff, and I maxed out my track voices in a heartbeat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
